The Local Situation in Santa Fe

On Wednesday, February 10, 2010 at 7:00 p.m. the Santa Fe City Council will hold a public hearing on:

1. An Ordinance to scrap the existing telecommunications ordinance (Chapter 27 of the City Code) and replace it with one that is far more favorable to the wireless industry, eliminating many of the controls and requirements presently existing. It will also permit the City to enter into franchise agreements with wireless providers.

2. A franchise to NewPath Networks to build a citywide network of “stealth” wireless sites blanketing the entire city (which may include small antennas on existing utility poles, fake lamp posts that are really cell towers, etc.). NewPath Networks would have the right to install antennas wherever they wish on any roads or sidewalks without further application. A second company, Extenet Systems, is also waiting in line for a franchise.

In Merrick, Long Island (population 20,000), a similar franchise resulted in the installation of 35 antenna sites throughout the city in a matter of months. Davis, California, which originally issued 37 encroachment permits to NewPath Networks, rescinded its approval on December 5, 2009.

These companies do not offer wireless services directly to the public. They merely build the antennas, and then sublease them to cell phone providers as well as WiFi providers who wish to expand their coverage citywide without the visual clutter that might alert the public. The Santa Fe franchise agreements would also grant use of these networks to the city fire and police departments for citywide expansion of the City's own wireless network. The City's own wireless network is presently confined to City Hall, the libraries, the Chavez Center, the Municipal Court, and other City buildings.

The new proposed telecommunications ordinance:

1. Eliminates the requirement for wireless companies that place antennas on public property to sign a lease with the City for each antenna.

2. Eliminates the requirement for all owners of telecommunications facilities to register annually with the City, and to provide a map of the location of all of their existing facilities.

3. Previously any company signing a lease with City had to provide a description of the services they will offer, detailed engineering plans, the location and route of their facilities, whether construction will require archaeological clearance, construction schedule and completion date, surveyors map, etc. All of this has been eliminated.

4. Previously the City Council had to find that the lease agreement "is in the best interest of the public". This wording is not included in the new drafted Ordinance.

5. The new Ordinance, for the first time, directs the City to "encourage the universal availability of telecommunication service", i.e. universal wireless coverage.

6. The new Ordinance will only apply to telecommunication networks located within the public rights-of-way. All regulations of antennas on private property contained in the old Chapter 27 have been scrapped.

7. "Parks, open space, trails or other City owned land are not considered public rights-of-way." In other words, antennas going up in parks, open space, trails, etc. will also not be regulated.

8. Antennas and towers built by any public utility will also be exempt from regulation. This includes, specifically, antennas for wireless meter reading and for the construction of the so-called "smart grid".

9. Under the old ordinance, the City Council was required to consider nine specific factors before approving a lease: the capacity of the property to accommodate the facilities, the capacity to accommodate additional utility facilities, damage to other public or private facilities or landscaping, the public interest, the public health, safety and welfare, the availability of alternatives, etc. The new Ordinance contains no guidance whatever to the City Council in granting a franchise.

10. Some of the information provided to the City by telecommunication providers about their operations is to be confidential and not available to the public.

   a. Each provider shall provide three year construction forecasts, but "The information required to be provided to the city under this paragraph is trade secret."

   b. "The City shall keep confidential any and all information related to a proposed sale" if the franchise changes hands.

11. The City will be exempt from lawsuits arising from any injury or damage resulting from the franchise granted.

Link to ordinance: www.santafenm.gov/DocumentView.aspx?DID=5186
Link to franchise: www.santafenm.gov/DocumentView.aspx?DID=5188



To sign the petition click on the link below to go to our page on the ipetitions web site:
www.ipetitions.com/petition/santafecelltower

a copy of the petition is available both at the above link and here:
www.cellphonetaskforce.org/santafepetition.html

Back to home page:
www.cellphonetaskforce.org